Elfnote Deck #736202 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 62/100 (Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Synchro Combo
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Going-Second Interaction
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Synchro Sumon multiple interaction-layered boards (Baronne, Crystal Wing, high-ATK boses) to control the game; Grind through resource advantage via hand traps and recursive plays; board-break into OTK
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Level-6 Elfnote center-zone monster, extend into Synchro boses with negation/removal, establish layered interruption and protection via Elfnote Continuous Spells
• Turn 2 (going second): Use hand traps and Mulcharmy Fuwalos to draw; leverage board breakers and disruptive Synchros; side into more going-second tools post-Game 1
• Recovery: Recursion via Elfnote field effects, GY recovery (Medius loop, Rhapsodia resurrection), and multiple independent Synchro lines reduce single-choke vulnerability
• After siding: Likely shifts to more hand traps and dedicated board breakers; side list unavailable — post-side stability is provisional

Why it scores here

Elfnote is a mid-tier Synchro engine with reliable opening consistency (P(≥1 starter hand5) ≈ 0.80) and layered interactive boards featuring negation-heavy Synchros. The deck excels at opening a functional Level-6 center-zone monster and building into multi-negate boards; however, median combo output is moderate (estimated 2–3 sumons, one negate), and going-second power relies heavily on hand traps and situational board breakers. Deck lacks a high-consistency going-second plan and is missing several high-inclusion Extra-Deck options (Baronne, Black Rose, Omega), reducing both ceiling and resilience. The score reflects systemic strength in starter reliability and interaction layering, tempered by modest combo floor, incomplete core inclusion (60% of meta core present), and thin going-second resilience—not an average of card scores or archetype meta-share.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Modifiers: none.