Dogmatika Deck #724062 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 52/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Control, Toolbox
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 41 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion Summon board with interaction and removal, then grind through opponent's resources; Going-second removal via board breakers and Extra Deck interactions
• Turn 1 (going first): Search and set up a Fusion monster board with 2-3 negation/removal effects via Fallen of Albaz lines or Tearlaments mills
• Turn 2 (going second): Use hand traps (Ash, Maxx C) and going-second removal cards (The Fallen & The Virtuous, Tearlaments Havnis) to disrupt, then pivot to offense
• Recovery: Graveyard recursion through Tearlaments monsters and Fusion Summon payoff; Visas Amritara loops for continuation
• After siding: No side deck provided; post-side strategy cannot be assessed

Why it scores here

This Dogmatika hybrid opens a searchable Fusion engine with moderate consistency (Fallen of Albaz, Tearlaments core at ~68% starter probability) but suffers from significant brick risk due to many 1-ofs, conflicting Normal Summons (Ecclesia, Kashtira, Scheiren), and a cluttered 41-card Main Deck. The deck reliably produces 2–3 interaction points (negation, removal, or recursion) via Fusion boards, but lacks the redundancy or ceiling to convert consistently into pressure—median combo output is modest, and going-first board resilience drops sharply after a single targeted interruption. Going-second capability is respectable via hand traps and Tearlaments disruption, though the absence of staple board breakers (Evenly Matched, Elder Entity N'tss) limits reach. Resource recovery is solid through GY loops but dependent on which Fusion monsters resolve. The deck is functional but inconsistent and mid-power; archetype inclusion stats show 24% core coverage (missing Evenly Matched, Branded Fusion, Elder Entity), confirming this is a deviation rather than a tuned list. No side deck limits best-of-3 resilience.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: 70% Midrange + 30% Control. Structural ≈ 55, Going First ≈ 56, Going Second ≈ 61, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 48. Modifiers: 41-card Main Deck size penalty (-3); Missing core staples (Evenly Matched, Elder Entity, Branded Fusion) (-2); No side deck (best-of-3 limitation) (-2); Going-second capability acknowledgment (2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural (55) + 0.20*TournamentReliability (48); Meta provisional (no dated sample)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.84 · key two-card combo ≈ 0.71 · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.22 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Solid Fusion engine consistency with Fallen of Albaz + Tearlaments cores creating multiple search lines
• Moderate interaction density via Fusion end-board (2–3 negation/removal effects typical)
• Going-second capability bolstered by Tearlaments Havnis, Mulcharmy draw effects, and 4 hand traps
• Graveyard recursion and Extra Deck toolbox provide decent recovery and resource regeneration
• Visas Amritara Synchro line adds routing flexibility and extended grind potential

Weaknesses

• High brick rate (~22% full brick estimated) due to 41-card Main Deck, 15 singletons, and conflicting Normal Summons
• Lacks redundancy and ceiling: most lines require live starter; single Ash on key card breaks flow
• Missing critical staple board breakers (Evenly Matched, Elder Entity N'tss, Garura, Titaniklad)
• Limited offensive closing power; heaviest bosses (Kaleido-Heart 3000 ATK) lack piercing or multiple attacks
• No side deck; unable to adapt post-side in best-of-3 format
• Deviation from consensus core build (24% core coverage) suggests non-optimized construction

Critical choke points

• Ash Blossom on Fallen of Albaz or Tearlaments Reinoheart blocks primary combo lines
• No board-breaker alternatives if going-second into established board; limited toolbox coverage
• Cavalier milling triggers (Scheiren, Havnis, Kashtira) lock Extra Deck summons, conflicting with Fusion strategy if missequenced
• 41-card Main Deck guarantees variance; T1 hand quality critical to viability

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: Legal (no copy-limit violations, size within range); Card text: all 40 distinct main cards resolved with descriptions; Banlist status: Maxx C, Tearlaments core (Havnis, Kashtira, Kitkallos, Sulliek, Scheiren) legal in Master Duel per BanMasterDuel field; Archetype composition: 25 distinct cards spanning Tearlaments (14 copies), Branded (8), Albaz Dragon (5), Mulcharmy (5), Dogmatika (2), others; Usage statistics available: 39 stat rows; core coverage 24% (6 of 25 core cards present)
• Observed: Tearlaments/Branded/Albaz engines present with full card text integrity; Extra Deck: 10 Fusion, 3 Synchro, 2 Xyz; functional routing for Fusion Summons; Hand-trap density: 4 cards (Ash ×3, Maxx C ×1); 48% P(≥1 going-second 6-card)
• Inferred: P(≥1 Fallen/Tearlaments starter in opening 5) ≈ 0.84 from hypergeometric archetype core group probability; Full brick estimate ~22% from 41-card size, 15 singletons, and conflicting Normal Summons (Ecclesia, Kashtira, Scheiren, Tuner overlap); Combo ceiling ~2–3 interaction effects per board based on Fusion monster text (Rindbrumm negate, Rulkallos negate, Mirrorjade banish, Granguignol mill); Median combo output ~2 summons + 1–2 searches + 1 removal from starter diversity analysis; Going-second power ~61/100 from hand-trap density (4/41) and Tearlaments disruption, offset by missing staple board breakers; Going-first resilience ~56/100: drops sharply after one targeted Ash on key starter (Ash on Reinoheart/Fallen blocks most lines); Resource economy ~62/100: GY recursion via Tearlaments and Visas loops sustain grind, typical +1 to +2 net card advantage; Interaction density ~2.5 effects per typical end-board; moderate durability vs removal-heavy opponents; Offensive closing power ~48/100: highest ATK bosses (Kaleido-Heart, Rulkallos 3000) lack piercing or multi-attack; opponent-dependent finish
• Provisional: Meta Power null: no dated metagame sample supplied; archetype meta-share unknown; 24% core coverage suggests deviation from consensus but does not imply weak power without context; Tournament reliability ~48/100: high variance from brick risk, single-choke-point lines, and no side deck severely limits best-of-3 repeatability and matchup adaptation
• Data gaps: No combo boards parsed: best_line, median_power_index, board_per_starter estimates are text-inferred from card descriptions only No tournament link: archetype meta-share percentage, per-pilot match record, top-placement frequency absent No YGOVN win-rate telemetry: going-first vs going-second match winrate, matchup-level outcomes, brick/OTK rates, game-level statistics unavailable No side deck provided: post-side performance, best-of-3 adaptation strategy, matchup-specific tech coverage cannot be assessed Meta Power requires a dated metagame sample with format-level coverage data; without it, archetype fit is Provisional