Magnet Warrior Deck #718481 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 63/100 (±5 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Combo
• Format: tcg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion summoning high-ATK boss monsters (Tellusion, Flux Ochsenfeld, Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon) while controlling the board with layered negation and removal.; Attrition via a robust hand-trap suite and board-breaking spells to dismantle established positions.
• Turn 1 (going first): Deploy Linear Plus Minus or Tellusion as anchors, supplement with Sigma Minus/Plus and Omega Plus for material recursion, and set interaction traps/spells.
• Turn 2 (going second): Disrupt opponent's opening with Ash Blossom, Ghost Belle, or Droll, then utilize Crossout Designator, Forbidden Droplet, or Harpie's Feather Duster to clear obstacles before executing fusion lines.
• Recovery: Recycle sent materials via Sigma Plus, Omega Plus, and Epsilon to search fresh starters or re-establish fusion engines after disruption.
• After siding: None available; the deck runs a zero-card side deck, forcing reliance on main deck techs for all matchups.

Why it scores here

This Magnet Warrior list operates as a resilient midrange system anchored by high-density fusion starters and a versatile extra deck. Its strength lies in exceptional consistency (99.5% chance to draw core pieces) and a heavily layered interaction suite featuring multiple negations, removal spells, and hand traps. However, the 55-card main deck introduces slight bloat, and the complete absence of a side deck severely hampers best-of-3 adaptability. Without parsed combo telemetry or dated metagame samples, performance metrics remain inferred, capping the structural score despite strong foundational design. Popularity and archetype share confirm accessibility but did not inflate the rating; the score reflects system-level cohesion, brick management, and turn-order balance.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 69, Going First ≈ 70, Going Second ≈ 70, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 65. Modifiers: Zero Side Deck (-5). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 1 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Exceptional consistency with 35 core copies and 99.5% starter draw probability
• Robust 12-copy hand trap suite protects against aggressive and combo opens
• Versatile extra deck coverage spans fusion, synchro, link, and xyz summoning types
• Strong layered interaction with multiple negation sources and dedicated board-breaker spells

Weaknesses

• Completely lacks a side deck, crippling best-of-3 adaptability and matchup tuning
• 55-card main deck is bloated, increasing brick risk despite high starter density
• Missing several top-tier archetype staples (S:P Little Knight, I:P Masquerena, Gallant Granite)
• No parsed combo data leaves median and ceiling performance inferred rather than verified

Critical choke points

• Absence of a side deck forces reliance on main deck techs for every matchup
• Heavy reliance on specific fusion materials (Rock monsters) can be disrupted by targeted removal
• Lack of tournament telemetry makes format fit provisional and long-term reliability uncertain

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality status confirmed across TCG banlist and size rules; Card counts, copy limits, and restricted card alignments verified; Archetype purity percentages and role tag distributions extracted from composition data
• Inferred: Dimension scores derived from hypergeometric probabilities and card text analysis; Combo floor, median, and ceiling estimated via functional role mapping; Strategy classification assigned as Midrange/Combo based on engine behavior; Choke points and recommendations deduced from structural gaps
• Provisional: Matchup format fit (D13) and meta power lack dated tournament samples; Long-term tournament reliability assumes current archetype standing holds
• Data gaps: no combos supplied — combo floor/median/ceiling is text-only inference no tournament link — archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN (going-first/second, matchup, game-level, brick/starter/OTK rates) — those signals are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied