Voidvelg Deck #718192 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Rush Duel Sevens

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 38/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Fusion, Grind
• Format: rush-duel-sevens

Legality

Main 36 / Extra 0 / Side 0 — status: Legal with warning.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Deploy fused Contact Fusion bosses with high ATK to overwhelm opponent through sustained resource pressure.; Grind advantage through repeated Contact Fusion loops and recovery effects.
• Turn 1 (going first): Establish Contact Fusion board with boss monsters; leverage Skill effects to search and thin deck; build interrupt layers through boss effects.
• Turn 2 (going second): Use going-second Skill activations and Contact Fusion to break board and establish own threats; limited board-wipe options suggest reactive pressure.
• Recovery: Recursion via graveyard effects; repeated Skill activation (once per Duel limit) for one-time search; deck thinning to improve future draws.
• After siding: Unknown; no side deck supplied and no post-side game data available.

Why it scores here

This Voidvelg deck achieves a low structural score due to significant card-resolution gaps, missing core pieces, and unverified combo patterns. The archetype core (26 cards) draws reliably into opening hands, and two Skill Cards provide search capability with one-per-Duel restrictions; however, 14 unresolved passcodes prevent full card-text evaluation and combo reconstruction. The deck runs only 68.8% of the core archetype (missing 5 standard cards), compromising engine coherence. With zero parsed combos, board power and recovery routes cannot be measured—only inferred from partial text fragments. Going-second capability is severely limited by the absence of board-breaker cards; going-first boards likely rely on fused boss monsters but lack documented interaction density. Tournament reliability is hampered by the Skill's once-per-Duel clause creating finite resource windows, and the 36-card main deck (above the 30-card minimum) introduces draw variance. Meta Power is provisional without dated metagame context. The score reflects structural weakness and data scarcity, not archetype unpopularity.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 33, Going First ≈ 42, Going Second ≈ 24, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 30. Modifiers: Card-resolution deficit (-8); Incomplete archetype core (-5); Skill once-per-Duel resource limit (-3). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 1 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Archetype core draws reliably (P ≥ 0.9993); opening-hand access to engine is nearly guaranteed.
• Skill Card search and deck-thinning mechanics provide one-time resource smoothing and consistency boost.
• Contact Fusion engine enables flexible summons; boss monsters described as high-ATK threats with utility effects (buffing, protection).
• Guides confirm established archetype with multiple playstyle variants, indicating meta adaptability.

Weaknesses

• 14 unresolved passcodes prevent full card-text evaluation; combo patterns, interaction density, and recovery routes are unknown.
• Missing 5 core archetype cards (31.2% gap); engine coherence compromised; likely causes inconsistent combo output.
• Skill once-per-Duel restriction severely limits search and recovery options after turn 1; no documented alternative lines.
• Zero going-second board-breaker cards or removal suite evident; likely weak to established boards.
• 36-card main deck increases draw variance; no documented hand-trap or interaction suite for disruption.
• No Extra Deck (format-standard); limits tutoring and fusion routing flexibility.

Critical choke points

• Skill activation exhaustion: both Skill Cards' key effects are one-per-Duel; once spent, recovery options collapse.
• Missing core support: 5 absent archetype cards likely include critical searchers, extenders, or boss summons; their loss cripples combo density.
• Unresolved card text: 14 passcodes unknown; cannot verify whether missing cards include hand traps, board breakers, or recursion; evaluation confidence permanently lowered.
• Going-second vulnerability: no documented board-wipe, removal, or non-engine pressure; likely lost game 2 vs established boards.

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Deck legality: Legal with warning (36 main, 0 extra, 0 side; within Rush Duel rules).; Archetype: Voidvelg (Rush Duel format).; Copy counts: 8 three-ofs, 4 two-ofs, 4 one-ofs; totals 36 main.; Skill Cards: Branded Journey (searcher, 3x), Starry Slumbering Memories (searcher + special-summon, 2x).; Format: Rush Duel Sevens (ban_field_used: BanDuelLink; no Extra Deck).
• Observed: Usage statistics: Voidvelg archetype has 16 core cards; this deck runs 11 of 16 (68.8% inclusion).; Missing core: 5 cards absent from archetype standard (717419, 1077176, 1002095, 772417, 717416).; Copy deviation: Card 1103823 runs 1x (typical 2x); Card 717424 runs 2x (typical 3x); Card 1061583 runs 2x (typical 3x).; Guides confirm Voidvelg is established archetype with documented playstyle variants.
• Inferred: Engine accessibility (D1): P(≥1 archetype core in hand 5) ≈ 0.9993; opening consistency estimated as high.; Brick rate (D2): Full brick proxy (no core) ≈ 0.0007; however, unresolved cards may create functional bricks.; Combo ceiling (D3): Contact Fusion boards inferred as mid-power fused bosses; no negation count or layer depth documented.; Combo floor (D4): Median output estimated as single fused boss + residual hand; high variance due to Skill one-per-Duel limits.; Interruption resilience (D5): No independent starter lines; single Skill activation per Duel creates choke point; estimated low.; Resource economy (D6): Guides mention rapid resource cycling and repeated advantage; grind potential moderate.; End-board interaction (D7): Boss-monster 'buff' and protection effects inferred; no negation count; interaction quality mid-range.; Going-second power (D8): No documented board breaker; going-second plan weak; estimated as 22/100.; Closing power (D9): High-ATK bosses referenced; piercing implied; closing tempo moderate.; Main Deck efficiency (D10): 36-card main with high copy density shows tight engine; missing core compromises coherence.; Pilotability (D14): Contact Fusion mechanics and two playstyle variants suggest moderate complexity; Skill once-per-Duel creates decision bottleneck.
• Provisional: Meta Power: No tournament link, no dated metagame sample, no per-pilot match record; archetype meta-share unknown.; Matchup coverage: Format fit unknown; Voidvelg representation in Rush Duel metagame unquantified.
• Data gaps: 14 unresolved passcodes: card text, frame, type, stats unknown; prevents combo routing and full system evaluation. No combos supplied: no best-line, median-power, or board-per-starter data; ceiling and floor inferred from text hints only. No tournament link: archetype meta-share, format representation, and per-pilot match records absent. No combo examples: cannot verify deck's actual output vs inferred output; confidence ceiling artificially capped. No side deck: best-of-3 context and post-side plans unknown. No win-rate telemetry: going-first vs going-second split, matchup data, brick rates, and game-level outcomes absent from YGOVN.