Labrynth Deck #698564 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 63/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Control
• Secondary strategies: Trap Stun
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 14 / Side 0 — status: Legal. Restricted cards run: Maxx "C" (Limited), Droll & Lock Bird (Semi-Limited).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Floodgate control and incremental advantage via trap recursion and hand-trap disruption; None consistent; no reliable OTK or alternate win path identified
• Turn 1 (going first): Open with hand-trap or searcher (Arianna/Labrynth Servant), establish board with low-cost traps, use Dimensional Barrier/Trap Holic to clear threats, recycle traps via Transaction Rollback and setup for attrition
• Turn 2 (going second): Six-card hand prioritizes backrow/traps, early Droll & Lock Bird to deny draws, answer threats with instant-speed traps and removal, look for board-breaker finishers late
• Recovery: Return-to-hand recursion (Arias, Cooclock) and set-traps from GY to rebuild board after disruption
• After siding: Not analyzed — no post-side specific tech or win condition defined

Why it scores here

The Labrynth shell is fundamentally a control/stun engine that reliably opens to a functional floodgate plan (D1 65) but suffers from brick risk on opening hands (D2 55) and very low combo ceiling (D3 40) with only median output (D4 50). It is resilient to interruption thanks to hand-traps, recursion, and redundant trap lines (D5 70) and maintains decent resource flow through trap reuse (D6 60). End-board interaction is strong (D7 75) while going-second pressure is limited (D8 55) and offensive closing power is modest (D9 45). The main deck is reasonably compact (D10 60) but Extra Deck coverage is shallow (D11 50). Matchup fit is below average against current formats (D13 40) and side adaptability is weak (D12 30), while pilot-dependent consistency keeps the floor survivable (D14 65).

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Control. Structural ≈ 63, Going First ≈ 60, Going Second ≈ 50, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 55. Modifiers: Archetype purity below threshold (-5); No combo ceiling defined (-5); Weak extra deck coverage (-5); No side deck plan (-5); Strong trap density (5); Limited tournament data (0). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ — · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.12 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Very strong trap-based interaction and board control
• High disruption redundancy via hand-traps and GY recursion
• Consistent turn-2 engine once traps are drawn
• Good resource sustainability through trap reuse

Weaknesses

• Low combo ceiling and limited OTK potential
• Opening hand brick risk due to mixed trap/combo ratios
• Shallow Extra Deck coverage and follow-through
• No defined side deck or post-side adaptation

Critical choke points

• Dependence on early trap draws for engine integrity
• Limited card advantage outside trap recursion
• No reliable alternate win condition

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: D5; D6; D7; D10; D11
• Inferred: D1; D2; D3; D4; D8; D9; D13; D14
• Provisional: D13
• Data gaps: no combos supplied — combo floor/median/ceiling inferred from text only no tournament link — archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry in YGOVN (going-first/second, matchup, brick/starter/OTK rates) Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied