Gishki Deck #690483 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG
40 Main, 15 Extra, incl. Gishki Abyss x3, Gishki Grimness x3, Gishki Shadow x3. Created Apr 19, 2026 by YGO Mod.
Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)
Created On: 04/19/2026
Main Deck (40)
- Gishki Abyss x3
- Gishki Grimness x3
- Gishki Shadow x3
- Gishki Vision x3
- Evigishki Neremanas x3
- Gishki Zielgigas x2
- Focused Aquamirror x3
- Gishki Aquamirror x3
- Into the Void x3
- Monster Reborn x1
- Moray of Greed x3
- Ocean of Regeneration x1
- Salvage x3
- Surface x2
- Tribute Doll x1
- Triple Tactics Talent x1
- White Mirror x1
- World Legacy Succession x1
Extra Deck (15)
- Cross-Sheep x1
- Salamangreat Almiraj x1
- Saryuja Skull Dread x2
- Spright Sprind x1
- Worldsea Dragon Zealantis x1
- Herald of Pure Light x1
- Number 35: Ravenous Tarantula x1
- Superdreadnought Rail Cannon Gustav Max x3
- Superdreadnought Rail Cannon Juggernaut Liebe x1
- Toadally Awesome x2
- Varudras, the Final Bringer of the End Times x1
Couldn't load the deck
Gishki (untitled) — Deck Power Evaluation
Final Contextual Deck Power: 25/100 (±5 · Confidence: Low)
| Overall score | Value |
|---|---|
| Structural Deck Power | 51 |
| Going First | 50 |
| Going Second | 35 |
| Meta Power | provisional |
| Tournament Reliability | 30 |
- Primary strategy: Combo
- Secondary strategies: Toolbox
- Format: ocg
Legality
Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 1 violation(s).
Identity & game plan
- Win condition: Ritual Summon Evigishki Neremanas / Gishki Zielgigas and overwhelm with big WATER monsters or XYZ burn; XYZ burn via Gustav Max / board control with Toadally Awesome
- Turn 1 (going first): Search Aquamirror, ritual summon Neremanas for negate and follow-up
- Turn 2 (going second): Limited due to no side and few board breakers; attempt to ritual and use Monster Reborn
- Recovery: Salvage, Surface, Ocean of Regeneration recursion
- After siding: No side deck (0 cards) – cannot adapt in best-of-3
Why it scores here
This deck is illegal in the OCG format because it runs 3 copies of the Limited card Into the Void, so the evaluation is theoretical and structural-only with a capped low score. The Gishki ritual engine shows high opening consistency (P(core≥1)≈0.99 inferred) but the list deviates from the archetype-standard core by omitting hand traps, Impermanence, and key extenders, leaving it fragile to disruption. Combo ceiling can produce a Neremanas negate plus an XYZ burn boss, but the median output is a single ritual monster with little interaction, and there is no side deck for post-side adaptation. The score reflects the system’s weak matchup fit and illegality, not the individual power of cards, and we did not average card scores.
Dimension scores
| # | Dimension | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Engine Accessibility & Consistency | 70 | Archetype core group 24 copies yields P(≥1 in 5)≈0.9934; multiple searchers present (Inferred) |
| D2 | Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management | 55 | Many spell cards and dead ritual bosses without setup suggest moderate brick risk (Inferred) |
| D3 | Combo Conversion & Ceiling | 60 | Best line via Neremanas + Gustav Max burn plausible but no parsed combos (Inferred) |
| D4 | Combo Floor & Median Output | 45 | No combo records; median expected single ritual summon with minimal board (Inferred) |
| D5 | Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy | 40 | Only 3 negation sources and ritual reliance; low route redundancy (Inferred) |
| D6 | Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind | 55 | Salvage, Surface, Ocean of Regeneration provide graveyard recursion (Inferred) |
| D7 | End-Board & Interaction Quality | 50 | Neremanas, Toadally Awesome, Varudras give some negation but sparse (Inferred) |
| D8 | Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power | 35 | No side deck and few removal spells; weak going-second breaking (Inferred) |
| D9 | Offensive Pressure & Closing Power | 55 | 3000+ ATK rituals and Gustav 2000 burn provide pressure (Inferred) |
| D10 | Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility | 50 | 40-card main with off-archetype splash; illegal copy inflates count (Verified/Inferred) |
| D11 | Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage | 55 | 15 extra slots with toolbox XYZ/Link but some likely unused (Inferred) |
| D12 | Side Deck Adaptability | 0 | Side deck count 0; no post-side adaptability (Verified) |
| D13 | Matchup Coverage & Format Fit | 30 | Missing standard hand traps/core interaction; format fit poor without meta sample (Provisional) |
| D14 | Pilotability & Error Tolerance | 50 | Ritual summon steps moderate complexity; limited decision points (Inferred) |
How the score was computed
Strategy profile: primary only. Structural ≈ 51, Going First ≈ 50, Going Second ≈ 35, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 30. Modifiers: Illegal copy limit violation (-26). Final formula: Illegal deck: structural theoretical only, final capped low (rubric Step 2)
Probability & combo summary
- Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.99 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.01 (all Inferred)
- Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
- Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines
Strengths
- High opening consistency for Gishki core (searchers, Aquamirror)
- Recursion via Salvage/Surface/Ocean of Regeneration
Weaknesses
- Illegal over Limit copy of Into the Void
- No hand traps or standard interaction (Ash, Impermanence, Maxx C missing)
- No side deck
- Deviates from proven core (missing One for One, Aquamirror Illusion, etc.)
Critical choke points
- Ritual Summon requires Aquamirror + monster; disruption stops line
- Into the Void illegal makes list unplayable in official events
Recommended changes
| Priority | Remove | Add | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Into the Void (reduce to 1 copy) | Infinite Impermanence or Ash Blossom | Fix legality and add interaction |
| 2 | Excess generic spells | Aquamirror Illusion / Gishki Nekromirror | Improve engine cohesion with standard core |
Evidence & confidence
- Verified: Legality status Illegal (Over copy limit on Into the Void); Side count 0; Card text from excerpts
- Observed: No parsed combos (0 boards)
- Inferred: Consistency probability from hypergeometric; Weak interruption resilience due to missing hand traps; Median output low
- Provisional: Matchup format fit without dated meta
- Data gaps: no combos supplied — combo floor/median/ceiling is text-only inference no tournament link — archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN (going-first/second, matchup, game-level, brick/starter/OTK rates) — those signals are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied
Couldn't load the combos
