Bubble Actress Deck #660751 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Rush Duel Sevens

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 42/100 (±12 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Unclear
• Secondary strategies: none
• Format: rush-duel-sevens

Legality

Main 33 / Extra 0 / Side 0 — status: Legal with warning.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Not determinable from card data (no card resolved). The guide snippet only says the archetype was underrated for lacking piercing against face-down defences (guide text, Inferred).; Unknown
• Turn 1 (going first): Unknown: no resolved card text defines a starter line.
• Turn 2 (going second): Unknown: no resolved card text defines a starter line.
• Recovery: Unknown: no recursion or search text could be read.
• After siding: None: the export contains no side deck, so no post-side plan exists.

Why it scores here

The deck is a compact 33-card Main Deck of 16 distinct cards, all within the Rush Duel 30–60 size rule and at Unlimited copy status, so its legality is clean. Its consistency estimate rests on the copy histogram: three-copy cards show roughly a 40% chance of appearing in a 5-card opening hand, and the usage data shows it runs 12 of 13 archetype-core cards. Because no card name, type or text resolved, the starter line, combo ceiling and interaction density cannot be measured, so those dimensions are held near the middle of the scale. Popularity and the guide's claim of strong tournament results were not treated as power; no win rate or match record exists. The score comes from consistency and compactness on the system as a whole, not from averaging any card scores, and the Low confidence band is wide on purpose.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Balanced (default / unclear strategy). Structural ≈ 44.65, Going First ≈ 42, Going Second ≈ 38, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: No side deck / weak post-side plan (-2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional); 0.80*44.65 + 0.20*40 = 43.72, then context modifiers -2 → 42

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ — · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Compact 33-card Main Deck of 16 distinct cards, inside the Rush Duel size rule
• All distinct cards are Unlimited, so no copy-limit risk
• Runs 12 of 13 archetype-core cards (92.3%), so the list is a recognisable archetype build
• Several 3-copy cards, which raises the chance of drawing key cards (Inferred)

Weaknesses

• No card resolved: names, types and text are all null, and 16 passcodes are unresolved
• No Extra Deck and no Side Deck, so there is no matchup or post-side flexibility
• Five singleton cards add draw variance (Inferred)
• Missing archetype-core card 715499 (60% inclusion, typically 3 copies); its absence may matter and cannot be assessed

Critical choke points

• Starter identity is unknown because no card text resolved, so the engine's critical cards cannot be named
• Missing core card 715499 may be an engine piece

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main Deck is 33 cards with 0 Extra and 0 Side, inside the Rush Duel 30–60 size rule; All 16 resolved cards are Unlimited, with no over-limit copies; 12 of 13 archetype-core cards are present (92.3%)
• Observed: The guide snippet reports the archetype placed strongly in tournaments (guide text only, not a match record)
• Inferred: Opening-hand probabilities by copy count (0.40 / 0.28 / 0.15 going first); Consistency rating based only on the copy histogram
• Provisional: Meta share and matchup fit (no tournament link); Tournament reliability and combo floor/ceiling (no recorded boards and no card text)
• Data gaps: All card-level fields are null (name, type, text), so no functional role per card can be assigned 16 passcodes in CardIDList could not be resolved to a card (counted as main) No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are not measurable No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record are absent No side deck: post-side performance cannot be assessed No win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN; Meta Power is Provisional