Azamina Deck #601339 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG

Download YDK
Download EDO
Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)

Created On: 11/24/2025

 
 

Official AI Deck Power Analysis
ComboConfidence: Medium
58± 8/ 100
Power Score
Structural 58
Reliability 50
Going First 58
Going Second 55

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 58/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

Overall score Value
Structural Deck Power 58
Going First 58
Going Second 55
Meta Power provisional
Tournament Reliability 50
  • Primary strategy: Combo
  • Secondary strategies: none
  • Format: tcg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 1 violation(s). Restricted cards run: Called by the Grave (Limited), Harpie's Feather Duster (Limited), Pot of Prosperity (Limited), Solemn Judgment (Limited), Triple Tactics Talent (Limited), Droll & Lock Bird (Semi-Limited).

Identity & game plan

  • Win condition: Azamina Fusion/Sinful Spoils engine to assemble and swing high-ATK beatsticks (e.g., Azamina Moa Regina, Azamina Sol Erysichthon, Snakes-Eyes Vengeance Dragon); Spell/Trap disruption and board control via hand-trap negation, resource loops through Azamina/Sinful Spoils graveyard recursion
  • Turn 1 (going first): T1-2 assemble core engine (Ash Blossom, Tri-Talent, DD, Call), set disruption, establish board with 12-14 Azamina/Sinful cards, then swing with 4000+ threats while maintaining hand traps and counters
  • Turn 2 (going second): Six-card hand survival, negate key plays with Ash Blossom/Imperial Order variants, answer summons with Solemn/Evenly Matched, recycle resources via DD/Sinful Spoils to close through counter traps and extra disruption
  • Recovery: If bricked, mill/draw into engine with Tri-Talent, DD, or hand-trap chains; recycle disruption from GY via Sinful Spoils and Droll to regain tempo and re-establish board presence

Why it scores here

The deck runs a Combo engine with strong ceiling via Azamina/Sinful Spoils fusion lines and high-ATK finishers, but consistency is constrained by format illegality (over-limited Droll & Lock Bird, key Limited/Forbidden targets) and a pronounced brick risk in the opening hand. Disruption is present through hand traps and Solemn coverage, yet vulnerability to targeted banlists and resource denial keeps the floor modest; side adaptability is weakened by narrow answers, and the lack of a reliable post-side plan caps reliable repetition.

Dimension scores

# Dimension Score Evidence
D1 Engine Accessibility & Consistency 55 Core engine present (Ash Blossom 100%, Tri-Talent 100%, Call 100%, DD 100%) but legality issues reduce effective consistency (Inferred).
D2 Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management 45 33% of main deck are high-impact hand-traps/tech; 21.54% probability of zero core in 5 cards raises brick risk (Inferred).
D3 Combo Conversion & Ceiling 65 Best line reaches 4000+ board control through Azamina Moa Regina + Snakes-Eyes Vengeance Dragon (Inferred from card text).
D4 Combo Floor & Median Output 50 Median output constrained by CBR brick rate and disruption windows (Inferred from probabilities and combo summary).
D5 Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy 55 Redundant answers via Ash Blossom, Evenly Matched, Solemn lines provide route recovery (Inferred).
D6 Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind 60 Resource loop via DD/Sinful Spoils graveyard recursion supports multi-turn grind (Inferred).
D7 End-Board & Interaction Quality 65 Negation suite (Ash Blossom, Solemn, Evenly Matched) and 27 removal-text cards supply sustained interaction (Inferred).
D8 Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power 50 Going-second plan relies on six-card hand quality and disruption; board-breaker density is moderate (Inferred).
D9 Offensive Pressure & Closing Power 60 Threats such as Azamina Moa Regina (3000/4000) and Snakes-Eyes Vengeance Dragon provide clear closing power (Inferred).
D10 Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility 60 25 distinct main cards with 7 core present; deck is compact but legality reduces effective flexibility (Inferred).
D11 Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage 55 Extra deck covers Fusion 100%, Synchro 3, Link 1, XYZ 1; access is strong but tied to specific materials (Inferred).
D12 Side Deck Adaptability 40 Side lacks coherent tech plan; adaptation is limited without post-side data (Inferred).
D13 Matchup Coverage & Format Fit 50 No dated metagame sample; archetype share noted but cannot translate to reliable fit (Provisional).
D14 Pilotability & Error Tolerance 60 Combo steps are moderate with defined decision points; error tolerance hinges on hand-trap timing (Inferred).

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Balanced. Structural ≈ 58, Going First ≈ 58, Going Second ≈ 55, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 50. Modifiers: format_legality_penalty (-7); brick_risk_penalty (-5); combo_ceiling_bonus (3). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

  • Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ — · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
  • Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
  • Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

  • Strong Azamina/Sinful Spoils engine with high-ATK fusion and synchro threats
  • Dense disruption suite (hand traps + 27 removal-text cards + negation)
  • Resource loops via DD and graveyard recursion support multi-turn grinds
  • High interaction density in both going-first and going-second paths

Weaknesses

  • Format illegality reduces effective card pool and consistency
  • High brick risk on 3-drop and zero-core opening hands
  • Side lacks coherent tech plan; post-side adaptability is limited
  • Dependence on specific Extra Deck materials can stall when key pieces are missed

Critical choke points

  • Opening hand must contain engine pieces; missing 1–2 key cards severely limits action
  • Facing targeted banlist/forbidden cards can collapse the core combo line
  • Post-side answers are narrow; opponent can sidestep disruption with non-interactive plays
Priority Remove Add Reason
1 Droll & Lock Bird (over-limited; replace with non-limited hand-trap alternative if format allows) Searchable disruption that is not format-restricted (e.g., non-limited counter traps or hand traps) Legality and consistency: removing the over-limited card reduces restriction violations and opens main-deck options
2 1–2 additional draw/filter spells outside the archetype to smooth 3-drops and reduce brick rate Mitigates 21.54% zero-core and 33% 3-drop brick probability
3 A compact post-side tech plan (e.g., meta-relevant floodgate or hand-trap) to preserve disruption after sideboarding Current side adaptability is weak; defined counters improve repeatable performance

Evidence & confidence

  • Verified: Card text and banlist entries from evidence.json; Deck structure (main 55 / extra 15) and legality status
  • Observed: No playable combo lines (combo count 0 in recorded boards)
  • Inferred: Consistency, brick rates, and combo ceiling/floor derived from probabilities, composition, and text roles; Interaction density and resilience inferred from hand-trap/trap/removal counts
  • Provisional: Meta Power, matchup outcomes, and tournament reliability (no dated metagame sample)
  • Data gaps: No combos supplied — combo floor/median/ceiling is text-only inference No tournament link — archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent No win-rate telemetry in YGOVN (going-first/second, matchup, game-level, brick/starter/OTK rates) — those signals are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied
Generated by · run 202608232013
 
Login to comment

More TCG Info
Azamina

Azamina Breakdown
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 
https://metaduelist.com/

We use cookies and similar technologies that are necessary to operate the website. Additional cookies are used to perform analysis of website usage. By continuing to use our website, consent to our use of cookies. For more information, please read our Privacy Policy.

Top