Amazoness Deck #567296 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 34/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Combo, Stun
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 42 / Extra 10 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 5 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Tistina Xyz pressure (Tistina, the Divinity that Defies Darkness, Galaxy Destroyer, Gustav Max) after hand-trap disruption; theoretical only because the list is illegal; Tistina boss monsters via Crystal God Tistina and Miasma Dragon Tistina searches
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Tistina searcher and hand traps; the going-first opening relies on the 5-card hand, with P(at least one searcher in 5) about 0.86 (Inferred)
• Turn 2 (going second): Use hand traps (11 in the Main Deck) to answer the opponent's first summon or search, then rebuild through Tistina searchers
• Recovery: Tistina searchers and recursion (Returned of the Tistina, Divine Domain Baatistina) rebuild the board after one interruption (Inferred)
• After siding: No Side Deck is registered (side_count 0), so there is no post-side plan; best-of-3 adaptation is unavailable

Why it scores here

This deck is scored as a system, not as an average of its cards, and it is illegal in OCG: three Forbidden cards (Called by the Grave, Triple Tactics Talent, Varudras) and two over-limit Limited/Semi-Limited copies (Ash Blossom at 3 vs 2, Droll & Lock Bird at 3 vs 1) mean the list cannot be played as built. Its engine is a Tistina searcher web of 13 searcher effects, so it usually opens a live starter (P at least one searcher in 5 about 0.86, Inferred), but the 11 hand traps and 14 tech cards carry a meaningful brick risk when no engine card is present. Interaction density is the strongest axis (hand traps, negation text, and removal from Ash, Droll and Infinite Impermanence), which helps on the going-second turn. Closing power comes from Tistina Xyz, Gustav Max and Galaxy Destroyer, but the Tistina core is only 2 of 25 usage-listed core cards, so the deck runs a loose, off-archetype build (exact archetype purity 0%). No combos, guides, side deck or tournament record were supplied, so the ceiling and median are text-only inference. Popularity was not credited; the score is capped low because the list is illegal.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 48, Going First ≈ 45, Going Second ≈ 58, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: Banlist exposure (-10); No side deck (-2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional); Illegal list, so theoretical/structural-only and capped low

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.86 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense Tistina searcher web gives a high chance of a live starter
• Eleven hand traps plus negation text give strong going-second interaction
• Xyz and Link finishers (Tistina, Gustav Max, Galaxy Destroyer) provide closing power

Weaknesses

• Illegal list: three Forbidden cards and two over-limit cards
• Loose build: exact archetype purity 0%, only 2 of 25 usage-listed core cards present
• No side deck, so no best-of-3 adaptation
• Hand-trap and tech density raises brick risk

Critical choke points

• Single-engine dependence on the Tistina searcher chain
• Forbidden and Limited copies must be removed before the deck is playable in OCG

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: five copy-limit violations and an illegal status; Card stats and text for Tistina, Gustav Max, Galaxy Destroyer, Varudras; Banlist status per card (Forbidden, Limited, Semi-Limited); Main 42 / Extra 10 / Side 0 sizes against OCG size rules
• Inferred: P(at least one searcher in 5) about 0.86 from hypergeometric estimate; Brick risk from hand-trap and tech density; Interaction density from card text; Going-second strength from hand-trap count
• Provisional: Meta Power (null, no dated metagame sample); Matchup and format fit (D13)
• Data gaps: no combos supplied, so combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference no tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent no side deck registered, so post-side adaptation cannot be scored no win-rate telemetry; going-first and matchup signals are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied