Amazoness Deck #533147 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 25/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 42 / Extra 12 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 6 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Tistina Xyz and Crystal God Tistina boards that clear face-down and face-up opposing cards, then close with Tistina, the Divinity that Defies Darkness and Gustav Max; Galaxy Destroyer and Utopic Dark Infinity as large Extra Deck boards once the Tistina engine is live
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Tistina starter (Demigod, Sentinel, or Fallen) and use it to add or summon a second Tistina piece, then convert into a Crystal God Tistina board. Depends on a Tistina starter being in the opening five (about 0.32 per copy-3 card, Inferred)
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird, and Infinite Impermanence to interrupt the opponent's first activations, then rebuild through Miasma Dragon Tistina or Demigod in the next turn
• Recovery: Recursion through Fallen of the Tistina and Returned of the Tistina from the GY into Xyz material, then rebuild with the remaining Tistina Spell/Traps
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck runs no Side Deck (0 cards), so there is no post-side plan

Why it scores here

The list is Illegal in OCG: four Forbidden cards (Called by the Grave, Moon of the Closed Heaven, Triple Tactics Talent, Varudras) and two over-limit Limited/Semi-Limited cards (Droll & Lock Bird at 3 copies, Ash Blossom at 3 copies), so the score is capped and labelled theoretical/structural-only. Structurally the Tistina engine gives a real Xyz and Crystal God board, with 11 hand traps and 13 removal-text cards providing interaction, but the starters are only about a 32% chance in an opening five and the spread across 54 off-archetype copies weakens engine coherence. No combo boards were recorded, so the floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference. Popularity of the Amazoness archetype was not credited, and the card scores were not averaged into the deck score; there is no side deck and no tournament data, so Meta Power stays provisional.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Balanced (default; primary strategy Midrange had no Structural profile applied, so the Balanced weights were used). Structural ≈ 41, Going First ≈ 40, Going Second ≈ 45, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 35. Modifiers: banlist exposure (-8); engine conflicts (-4). Final formula: No reliable metagame: 0.80*41 + 0.20*35 = 39.8; modifiers -12 gives 27.8; Illegal cap applied, final 25 (theoretical/structural-only)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.32 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Tistina engine has real Xyz and Crystal God boards (Verified text)
• 11 hand traps and 13 removal-text cards give interaction density (Verified text, Inferred quality)
• Recursion via Fallen and Returned of the Tistina gives some redundancy (Inferred)

Weaknesses

• Illegal in OCG: four Forbidden cards and over-limit Droll and Ash (Verified)
• Starter access is weak at about 0.32 per copy-3 card in hand 5 (Inferred)
• Extremely low archetype purity (0% exact name) with six sub-archetypes (Verified)
• No side deck, so no post-side adaptation (Verified)

Critical choke points

• Tistina starters in hand: a hand without one has no engine (Inferred)
• Ash Blossom and Infinite Impermanence are the only answers to a going-second opening (Inferred)

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: 4 Forbidden cards and copy-limit violations for Droll and Ash in OCG; Main 42, Extra 12, Side 0 counts against OCG size rules; Card text and stats for all listed cards; Usage stats: 3 of 12 archetype core cards present
• Inferred: Starter probability ~0.32 per copy-3 card in hand 5; Engine coherence and brick risk from composition and card text; Going-first and going-second plans from text and hand-trap density
• Provisional: Meta Power and format fit (no dated metagame sample or tournament link)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied, so floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link, so archetype meta-share and per-pilot record are absent No win-rate telemetry (going-first/second, matchup, brick and starter rates) Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied No side deck, so post-side plans cannot be evaluated