Wyrms : Rush! Deck #445076 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Rush Duel Sevens

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 38/100 (±15 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Blind-Second/OTK
• Format: rush-duel-sevens

Legality

Main 36 / Extra 0 / Side 0 — status: Legal with warning.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Not determinable from resolved cards. Guide text describes a Wyrm board that converts through fusion, summons and boss attacks (Inferred from guide text only, unverified against the card list).; Guide text claims a one-turn kill route; no recorded boards confirm it (Provisional).
• Turn 1 (going first): Not determinable: 17 of 17 distinct passcodes are unresolved, so no starter or extender can be named (Provisional).
• Turn 2 (going second): Not determinable: no side deck and no recorded boards (Provisional).
• Recovery: Not determinable from the evidence (Provisional).
• After siding: None: side count is 0, so there is no post-side plan.

Why it scores here

This is a 36-card Rush Duel main deck of 17 distinct passcodes with no Extra Deck and no side deck, and none of its 17 passcodes resolved to a card name or text, so the score rests on copy structure and draw odds rather than on what the cards do. The archetype core group is present at 11 copies, giving an estimated 0.86 chance of at least one in the opening five, but that figure does not confirm the cards are starters. No recorded boards exist, so the ceiling and median cannot be measured and the deck earns no credit for combo output. Interaction, going-second strength and post-side options are unverified or absent, so those dimensions stay low. The guide text calls this list a top-tier one-turn-kill deck, but that is popularity and claim, not evidence, and it earns no points; the score also does not come from averaging individual card scores.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Balanced (default; primary strategy unclear from evidence). Structural ≈ 41, Going First ≈ 40, Going Second ≈ 36, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: unresolved card identities (-3). Final formula: No reliable metagame: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers = 0.80*41 + 0.20*40 - 3 = 38 (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ — · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Compact 17-passcode list with a full 36-card main deck inside the Rush Duel size range
• Archetype core group has a high estimated chance of appearing in the opening five cards (Inferred)

Weaknesses

• No card names or text resolved, so every functional claim is unverified
• No recorded boards, so the deck's real output is unknown
• No side deck and no interaction cards identified
• Usage statistics show 14 of 19 core cards missing from the list, though this may be an identity-resolution artifact

Critical choke points

• The archetype core group depends on a single unresolved starter set; if these cards are not the real starters, the consistency estimate is void

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal main-deck size of 36 within the 30 to 60 range; Copy histogram of 9 triples, 1 pair and 7 singles; No side or Extra Deck cards registered
• Observed: Usage statistics show the archetype core group present in 5 of 19 core rows
• Inferred: Archetype core group has about a 0.86 chance of at least one card in the opening five; Interaction is weak based on zero flags, though card text is unresolved
• Provisional: Strategy classification as Combo and secondary OTK is based on guide text only; Meta Power and matchup fit are absent; Going-first and going-second performance are unmeasured
• Data gaps: All 17 distinct passcodes are unresolved, so card names, types and text are unknown No recorded boards, so combo ceiling, median and power distribution cannot be measured No tournament link, so archetype meta share and pilot match record are absent No win-rate telemetry exists for going-first, going-second or matchups Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample