Cyber Dragon Deck #407443 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Duel Links

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 61/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Midrange
• Format: duel-links

Legality

Main 25 / Extra 9 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Extra Deck boss from Cyber Dragon engine: Cyber End Dragon (4000 ATK, piercing) or Cyber Dragon Nova / Cyber Dragon Infinity / Chimeratech Rampage Dragon once Cyber Dragon material is on board; Cyber Dragon Sieger and Wind-Up Arsenal Zenmaioh as backup board and removal/extension lines
• Turn 1 (going first): Normal Summon Cyber Dragon Core to search a Cyber spell/trap, or Cyber Dragon Nachster / Cyber Dragon Herz to make Cyber Dragon in the GY, then Cyber Repair Plant or Cyber Emergency to fuel a Fusion or Xyz
• Turn 2 (going second): Effect Veiler (3 copies) to negate an opposing monster effect, Jizukiru or Cyber Dragon Core special summon, then rebuild Cyber Dragon bodies from the GY
• Recovery: Cyber Repair Plant and Cyber Revsystem recur Cyber Dragons from the GY; Cyber Dragon Nova can Special Summon Cyber Dragons from GY to rebuild the board
• After siding: No side deck registered; post-side plan is not available in this export

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens its engine: the hypergeometric estimate puts at least one archetype-core card in a 5-card opening hand at about 0.96, and the searcher text density is high (10 cards), so the Cyber Dragon bodies are usually live on turns 1 and 2 (Inferred). Its conversion ceiling rests on a dense Extra Deck of Cyber Dragon Nova, Infinity, Sieger, Rampage Dragon and Cyber End Dragon, which turns Cyber Dragons in the GY into boss monsters; the ceiling is credited from card text only because the deck has no recorded boards, so the median is scored conservatively and marked Inferred. Interaction (three Effect Veiler, Cybernetic Overflow, Jizukiru) and GY recursion (Cyber Repair Plant, Revsystem, Nova) give it real resilience, but the deck has no side deck and 14 off-archetype copies, which lower its post-side and efficiency scores. Popularity was not credited: the archetype usage stats confirm the list is a real, accessible build, and the score comes from consistency, median output, and interaction on the system, not from averaging card scores or from any win-rate data.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo primary; Midrange used as cross-check only, not blended. Structural ≈ 65, Going First ≈ 66, Going Second ≈ 60, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 60. Modifiers: no side deck (-2); Semi-Limited exposure (-1). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional, no dated meta sample)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.96 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.04 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Archetype core opens about 96% of 5-card hands
• Nine Extra Deck slots all filled with functional bosses and Fusion/Xyz/Link access
• Three Effect Veiler plus two Cybernetic Overflow give real interaction
• GY recursion (Cyber Repair Plant, Revsystem, Nova) keeps the engine going after a board break

Weaknesses

• No side deck and no post-side plan
• Only 58.8% exact-name purity; 14 off-archetype copies (Book of, Kaiju, Wind-Up, generic)
• Two Fusion summon spells plus Rampage Dragon adds Fusion dependence on Cyber Dragon bodies
• No combo or tournament data; the ceiling and median are inferred from text

Critical choke points

• Cyber Dragon Core / Nachster as the first-turn starter: losing these to a hand trap or a single hand-trap/negate line stalls the T1 plan
• Cybernetic Overflow is Semi-Limited at its maximum 2-copy limit, so a restriction change would weaken the engine

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal in Duel Links: 25 Main, 9 Extra, 0 Side with no violations; Cybernetic Overflow Semi-Limited at legal 2 copies, run at 2; Exact-name purity 58.8%; 14 off-archetype copies
• Observed: Archetype core usage 100% for Cyber Dragon and Herz in the archetype stat rows
• Inferred: P(>=1 core card in opening 5) ≈ 0.96; Combo ceiling and median from card text; Interaction density from text flags
• Provisional: Meta power and matchup fit (no dated sample); Post-side plan (no side deck)
• Data gaps: no combos supplied: combo floor/median/ceiling is text-only inference no tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN; going-first/second, matchup and brick rates are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied usage statistics marks Cyber Dragon Nova (58069384) and Chimeratech Rampage Dragon (84058253) as in this deck=false although both are in this deck's Extra Deck; the usage join appears to ignore the Extra Deck, so the missing core cards list overstates absence no side deck registered in the export, so post-side scores rest on a missing plan