Zoodiac Deck #36748 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 18/100 (Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Control/Toolbox
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Stun
• Format: tcg

Legality

Main 56 / Extra 17 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 7 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Layered interaction and floodgate control via negation and removal; Beatdown via Tri-Brigade Link Monsters or converted Zoodiac Xyz plays
• Turn 1 (going first): Establish interaction floor (Shuraig, Solemn, Anti-Spell, hand traps) and block threats; limited explosive setup due to illegality
• Turn 2 (going second): Use hand traps (Infinite Impermanence, Effect Veiler, D.D Crow) and going-second removal (Cosmic Cyclone, Bystial effects) to break boards
• Recovery: Tri-Brigade recursion (Bearbrum, Ferijit) and Bystial banish-to-search mechanics; limited by illegal extra copies
• After siding: No side deck supplied; cannot evaluate best-of-3 adaptation

Why it scores here

This deck is Illegal in TCG format and receives theoretical-only evaluation. It violates copy limits on five cards (Bystial Magnamhut ×3, Solemn Judgment ×3, Anti-Spell Fragrance ×3, Triple Tactics Talent ×2), runs Spright Elf ×2 (Forbidden), and exceds the Extra Deck by two slots. Setting aside illegality, the structure shows heavy reliance on interaction and hand-trap density (9 copies) over coherent combo lines—the archetype core (Spright, Tri-Brigade, Zoodiac) is fragmented and underepresented relative to generic negation/removal tech. With no combo evidence and only 16% of the archetype-standard core present, opening consistency and combo median are low; the deck prioritizes disruption density and going-second board-breaking over explosive first-turn plays. Pilotability is hindered by conflicting engine demands (Spright 2-monster loops, Tri-Brigade banish-sumon, Zoodiac Xyz) and decision complexity without clear payoff lines.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Modifiers: none.